Gabriola Organization for Agricultural Liberty

“Embracing Change”

(This is a conversation—all that is missing is your voice)

The intent of goal-2025  is to create a web based portal to assist Gabriola Islanders to build  toward a resilient and sustainable agricultural base over the next 15 years.  This is a forum for the sharing of knowledge,  access to resources,  practical ideas,  and affirmative actions to build linkages  through the food we eat and the land that supports us.  We will endeavor to maintain a local holistic view while  keeping a regional and global perspective.

This is not a traditional blog— the articles are gleaned from many sources  and categorized,  giving “you” the reader the choice of further reading.   In some ways this is just a personal filing system with an ulterior motive. I personally believe that collectively we can make positive changes and this is an attempt to build a framework that will allow us to individually contribute to the building of  resilience in our community.

“Imagine” a place for meaningful dialogue  where we can  share our thoughts and experiences focusing on “one” thing we all have in common — food!  A continuum from the past through the present to a place we collectively envision for the future.

(FORMS ARE AT THE TOP OF PAGE UNTILL FURTHER NOTICE)

On the right hand side of the page you will find various categories for my personal selection of relevant postings.  (suggestions always welcome)  In addition there are  discussion groups to facilitate a sharing of information.  Postings for exchanges/trade of seeds, plants and food offerings and requests can be made. Community gardens, new and existing,  Cooperatives, Social Enterprise and Linking Future Farmers, and growing number of links.

“What we know, frames what we see and what we see, frames what we understand” (Paul Hawken)

*****Comments can be made at the end of each article–or scroll down to the bottom right to register and participate in the forums.

This site is entirely funded by Gabriola Islanders in collaboration with:

www.slo-foods.com

Posted in Home | 1 Comment

Dear Organic Consumer,

With just nine days to go until our May 26 deadline, our ‘Drop the Money Bomb on Monsanto’ campaign is generating more excitement than I ever imagined possible. Each day more people, more websites, more media outlets join in this unprecedented, coordinated effort to raise enough money to fight back against Big Biotech and Food Inc. and to – finally – win the right to know if our food contains GMOs.

If you haven’t already pitched in, please make a donation soon. If you have already contributed, please forward this week’s issue of Organic Bytes to friends, or share it with your social media networks.

We need your help today to raise $1 million for the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act. If we reach our goal by May 26, we will receive a matching $1 million gift from Mercola.com, Nature’s Path, Lundberg Family Farms, Eden Foods and a number of public interest organizations.

I’ve had the pleasure of speaking directly with some of you who have called in to make donations. Many of you have thanked OCA for bringing so many groups together around this cause. Twenty years ago, when the FDA outrageously declared that genetically modified foods were “substantially equivalent” to unmodified foods, and therefore would not be labeled, we and our allies didn’t have large email lists, Internet fundraising capabilities, or social media. We couldn’t have waged a massive campaign like this.

Today, we can almost instantly connect millions of people – and potentially raise millions of dollars – in order to fight back.

And it’s working. Groups like Food Democracy Now!, Mercola.com, Natural News, Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, Mother Earth News, OccupyMonsanto360, Alliance for Natural Health, the Farm Food Freedom Coalition, Real Food Media, FoodFreedomGroup.com, Institute for Responsible Technology, and many more are reaching out to their grassroots networks, in a massive show of solidarity.

Since May 1, we have raised over $600,000, which will go directly toward winning the campaign in California, as well as supporting other state GMO labeling campaigns. With your help, we will raise another $400,000 – plus a $1 million matching gift – by May 26.

This GMO labeling battle in California is huge. It’s the best opportunity – our last best hope – to show the government and those corporations that have a stranglehold on our food supply that we – moms, dads, grandparents, students, ordinary citizens – will no longer be kept in the dark about genetically engineered bacteria, viruses, and foreign DNA routinely being laced into our food. We will no longer sit back and allow companies and retailers to label or market GMO-tainted food as “natural” or “all-natural.”

We have a real chance to win in California on November 6. The Biotech industry can’t win in November by buying off politicians because this is a citizens’ ballot initiative. Registered California voters bypassed the legislature to put this on the ballot themselves. Our members and our allies gathered nearly one million signatures – almost twice as many as we needed – to put this issue on the ballot. Polls show that 90 percent of voters support GMO labeling.

Unable to buy their way to victory, Big Biotech and Food Inc. will use their huge war chest to try to scare voters into defeating this initiative. They’ve already cranked up the propaganda machine with the usual lies: Labeling will make food more expensive, family farmers will suffer economically; the law is too confusing, etc.

None of this is true. Almost 50 countries – including Russia, China, Japan and the European Union – require labeling of genetically engineered food and ingredients. Far from the disastrous results that Monsanto would have us believe, labeling has not significantly increased food costs, nor are consumers in those countries confused. Small farmers are doing just fine.

What has happened is this: Once labeling was required by law, millions of consumers rejected GMO-tainted food products. Consequently food manufacturers and retailers stopped selling GMOs. Farmers stopped growing them. Sales of organic products increased significantly. Consumers, empowered with the Right to Know, became more knowledgeable and healthier. Farms and fields became less contaminated. All because companies like Monsanto and Dow, Wal-Mart, Con-Agra, and Kellogg’s were no longer able to force-feed genetically engineered foods to the public.

It is hard to believe that here, in the US, we continue to allow Monsanto and corporate agribusiness to carry out the largest food experiment in history, to literally treat us as like lab rats. It’s time to put an end to this. It’s time to pass the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Foods ballot initiative.

Please take a minute today to think about who – among your family, friends, business associates, social media contacts – might be willing to donate to this campaign, or to help promote the campaign to their networks, online or offline.

This is the food fight of our lives, the battle that will determine the future of food and farming. The stakes are high. Your support is critical.

Please give as generously as you can. And please help us spread the word.

For an Organic Future,


Ronnie Cummins
Director, Organic Consumers Association and Organic Consumers Fund

P.S. All money raised for this campaign will go through the Organic Consumers Fund, a 501(c)4 allied organization of the Organic ConsumersAssociation, focused on grassroots lobbying and legislative action. Donations are not tax-deductible.

Posted in Fresh Offerings | Leave a comment

Richmond poised to take stand on genetically modified crops

By Randy Shore, Vancouver Sun April 10, 2012

The City of Richmond is poised to join a growing number of B.C. municipalities that oppose the cultivation of genetically modified crops and plants within their boundaries.

A resolution has been working its way through city hall since June 2010, when Arzeena Hamir of the Richmond Food Security Society and April Reeves of GE Free B.C. pitched councillors on proposed wording that would keep Richmond free of genetically engineered trees, plants and crops.

“We got a call a few days ago from city staff saying they are finally ready to write the report,” said Hamir. “It’s been lost in the legal department for nearly two years, but the resolution is expected to come to council in May.”

Richmond councillor Harold Steves said staff were struggling with the question of how to deal with several farmers in Richmond already growing GE corn.

Opponents say crops such as canola that are engineered to survive pesticide applications lead to excessive use of chemical weed controls. They also worry that engineered genetic material will mix with conventional and organic crops and that foods made with the products of genetically engineered soy and corn may generate unforeseen allergic reactions in consumers.

If Richmond council passes a resolution opposing genetically engineered crops it would join a growing patchwork of B.C. municipal governments to have taken the step.

Powell River, Saltspring Island, Kaslo, Rossland and Nelson have already passed resolutions opposing the cultivation of genetically modified crops — often known as genetically modified organisms or GMOs — within their boundaries.

The Healthy Saanich Advisory Committee last year resolved to seek a ban on GE crops and directed District of Saanich staff to explore the issue.

Anti-GMO pitches have also been made in Campbell River, and Comox, according to GE Free B.C. spokesman Tony Beck.

“We anticipate that Richmond will be the next to become a genetically engineered-free zone,” he said.

While local governments in Canada make largely symbolic gestures aimed at raising concerns about the human health and environmental implications of GE crops and foods, citizens in the United States are able to take direct action on the demand side of the equation, according to Lucy Sharratt, spokeswoman for the Canadian Biotechnology Action Network.

Just Label It, a coalition of environmental, farming and religious organizations in the United States has submitted a petition to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration containing 1.1 million signatures demanding that products that contain GE crops be labelled.

The coalition says that U.S. law allows them to pursue legal action if the FDA fails to respond.

Last year, another coalition of consumer and environmental groups in California filed an initiative to place a referendum question on the state ballot this fall asking if food products containing GE ingredients should carry a label. California Right to Know has until April 22 to collect 500,000 signatures to ensure their proposal will be on the 2012 ballot.

“If the California initiative goes through it could spread across the States and Canada,” said Alex Atamanenko, B.C. MP for the Southern Interior. “It’s like the way they set the standard for vehicle emissions in the United States.”

Atamanenko introduced an unsuccessful bill to Parliament two years ago that would have required GE foods to be labelled in Canada.

“The time is coming that we will have the right to know that we are eating genetically modified food,” he said.

Canadian activists can only look south with envy, said Sharratt.

“The decision-making apparatus for GMO foods in Canada is buried in an unaccountable bureaucracy,” she said. “Our friends in the United States are forcing this issue onto the public agenda.”

Canada does not require food labels to declare the presence of GE crops such as corn, soy and canola all of which are widely grown commodity crops in North America. Nearly all of those commodity crops are used to manufacture ingredients for processed foods rather than being eaten directly.

About 80 per cent of processed foods in grocery stores contain ingredients from genetically modified crops, according to the Grocery Manufacturers Association.

Food processors may voluntarily label a product for sale in Canada as containing GE ingredients, but so far none have.

Health Canada and the FDA both maintain that foods that contain GE ingredients are no different from those made with conventional crops.

“Labelling isn’t a safety issue, it’s an issue of consumer choice and we know that consumers don’t want to eat genetically engineered foods,” said Sharratt.

With a file from Reuters

rshore@vancouversun.com
Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Richmond+poised+take+stand+genetically+modified+crops/6437736/story.html#ixzz1rkA6Ic1a

Posted in Agricultural News, GMO's | Leave a comment

Village Vancouver News

VILLAGE VANCOUVER NEWSLETTER AND CALENDAR OF EVENTS

APRIL 2012

Welcome to the April 2012 edition of the Village Vancouver monthly newsletter and Calendar of Events!
http://www.villagevancouvernews.blogspot.ca/
ALso see link for Village Vancouver  under Local food sustainability organizations
Posted in Fresh Offerings | Leave a comment

Growing Hope

Eyes on B.C.

by Lisa Verbicky

April 3, 2012

 

When I arrive at Nanoose Edibles Farm, snow is gusting through the black branches of the orchard trees, and I see only a few moving silhouettes across a field, hunched, fending off the barrage.  The image of a nuclear winter crosses my mind, or Siberia, desolate, baron, starved, crawling with desperate marauders.

http://www.eyesonbc.com/articles/growing-hope/index.html

http://www.eyesonbc.com/articles/growing-hope/index.html

Posted in Agricultural News, Local Community Actions | Leave a comment

CFIA Orders Slaughter of 41 Apparently Healthy Heritage Sheep

CFIA Orders Slaughter of 41 Apparently Healthy Heritage Sheep

TRENT HILLS, ON: Montana Jones, a breeder of rare Shropshire sheep, has been notified by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) that they intend to destroy 41 of her apparently healthy sheep—including 20 pregnant ewes—on Monday, April 2, 2012.

The order is part of the “scrapie eradication program” undertaken by the federal government in 2010 with funding of $4.5 million. Scrapie is an illness which affects the productivity and longevity of sheep but is not transmissible to humans.

All of the condemned animals tested by the CFIA in live biopsies tested negative for scrapie. Furthermore, none of the animals has shown any clinical symptoms of the disease in the 12 years that Jones has been raising sheep. Obvious symptoms such as chronic scratching, head tremors and an irregular “bunny-hop” gait would ordinarily be apparent if any animals were infected.

A single sheep (known by its tattoo number WHE 24S) sold by Jones to an Alberta farm in 2007, was discovered approximately 3 years later to have scrapie. But scientists cannot accurately determine when or where it acquired the infection. Jones’ farm has nevertheless been under quarantine since January of 2009, causing her great financial hardship.

CFIA veterinarians admit that symptoms of scrapie normally appear within two to five years but have nevertheless condemned the 41 sheep even though none of them has had contact with WHE 24S for almost 5 years. In fact, 37 of the sheep slated for destruction were not even born until after WHE 24S had left the farm.

Jones has been negotiating with the CFIA through her lawyer Karen Selick of the Canadian Constitution Foundation, in the hope of saving the apparently healthy sheep from slaughter, but to no avail.

“This is an endangered breed. They’re due to have lambs soon so I’m expecting 30 to 40 new babies. If CFIA kills my pregnant mothers, there will be only 107 or so females left in Canada,” said Jones.

“CFIA personnel rejected several alternative risk-control measures we offered, and ignored the nearly 3,000 Canadians who petitioned to stop them. They could at least let the lambs be born. My last desperate proposal is an offer to sacrifice 30 sheep for destruction if they would allow me to hold back 11 of the most significant rare breeding stock. Then they’d have a number of brains to test before destroying every single one. If the tests come back negative, they could re-evaluate and at least save some.” Jones explained.

“They have also been refusing to allow a third party tissue test. They plan to take away the only evidence I might have to disprove their results if they claim there is a positive. I have seen the CFIA make numerous errors and am very concerned that their results could be inaccurate.”

Ms. Jones launched http://ShropshireSheep.org to educate and inform the public on the importance of conserving heritage Shropshire sheep. Her Wholearth flock is comprised of genetics which date back to breeding stock imported from the U.K. in the late 1800’s.

If Jones chooses to defy the destruction order, she could be subject to a fine of up to $250,000 and up to two years’ imprisonment. “Montana’s liberty is clearly at stake here,” said lawyer Karen Selick. “The government therefore has a duty not to act arbitrarily or disproportionately, but in our view it is doing both,” Selick alleged.

CFIA has discretion to pay compensation for the confiscation of private property, but may withhold reimbursement if Jones breaches its destruction order. “These rare Shropshires are irreplaceable. Whatever they might pay me wouldn’t be nearly enough to obtain more from England. Those genetics don’t even exist there any more. I’ve lost 12 years of work saving this breed, lost over 2 years of farm income—the ordeal has pretty much exhausted me. Now I’m going to lose these beautiful ewes and their lambs too. ” said Jones.

The 41 sheep have been chosen for destruction specifically because of their genetic makeup. Ironically, one of the CFIA veterinarians involved in condemning the sheep is co-author of a 2010 research paper warning against the dangers of a “selection strategy that takes a sheep population towards homogeneity.”

A demonstration is planned at Jones’ farm on Monday, April 2. Details will follow in a separate media advisory.

The Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF) has been providing legal representation to Montana Jones. The Canadian Constitution Foundation (“Freedom’s Defence Team”) is a registered charity, independent and non-partisan, whose mission is to defend the constitutional freedoms of Canadians through education, communication and litigation.

- 30 -

For further information, contact: 

Montana Jones
Wholearth Farmstudio
705-696-2556
montana@wholearth.com

Karen Selick
Litigation Director
Canadian Constitution Foundation
Toll-free: 888-695-9105 x. 104
kselick@canadianconstitutionfoundation.ca
www.theCCF.ca

Web links: 
• Shropshire Sheep and news on CFIA
• the Shropshire farmers story on importance of heritage Shropshire sheep history
• Rare Breeds Canada
• Shropshire Sheep on Facebook
• Wholearth Farmstudio
• Canadian Constitution Foundation

Twitter:
@WholearthFarms
#SaveOurShrops
@kselick
@CDNConstFound

Posted in Agricultural News, B.C. and Canada food Security issues, Canadian Food Inspection Agency CFIA | Leave a comment

Farmers and Eaters Unite at Food Sovereignty forum

Farmers and eaters unite at food sovereignty forum This external link will open in a new window: http://boundarysentinel.com/news/farmers-and-eaters-unite-food-sovereignty-forum-18102 

Broken down barns and empty fields that haven’t seen a crop in years left National Farmers’ Uni0n (NFU) vice president of policy, activist and farmer Colleen Ross wondering about the Boundary. [Boundary Sentinel, March 25, 2012]

 

 

 

Posted in B.C. and Canada food Security issues | Leave a comment

Greeks ditch middleman to embrace the “potato revolution”

BC Food Security Gateway

Food Security NewsGreeks ditch middleman to embrace ‘potato revolution’

Greeks ditch middleman to embrace ‘potato revolution’ This external link will open in a new window: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17369989

 

The crowds keep building: hundreds of Greeks are queuing up to take part in what they’re calling the “potato revolution”. [BBC, March 15, 2012]

 

Posted in International food Security issues | Leave a comment

Push for ‘Agent Orange’ corn divides agribusiness, consumers

Push for ‘Agent Orange’ corn divides agribusiness, consumers This external link will open in a new window: http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2012/mar/18/monster-weeds-debate-grows/ 

  • Dow is seeking permission from the Agriculture Department to begin marketing a variety of corn to farmers that has been modified with a gene to resist an older, more toxic herbicide called 2,4-D. If the USDA approves it, Dow will then seek permission to sell similarly modified soybean and cotton seed. [Commercial Appeal, March 18, 2012]

 

 

 

Posted in International food Security issues | Leave a comment

Vandana Shiva (Feature Interview)

Three of The Current

Vandana Shiva (Feature Interview)

The news magazine, Asiaweek, calls Vandana Shiva one of the five most powerful communicators in Asia. The British newspaper, The Guardian, named her one of the top female activists and campaigners. Vandana Shiva is based in New Delhi.

She’s trained as a physicist, but she has made her mark as an agricultural researcher, environmental activist and an advocate for women’s rights. Twenty five years ago she started something called “Navdanya” a global movement to protect the rights of farmers to save seeds.

Recently, Vanada Shiva left her home in India to pick up an Honorary doctorate from one of her old schools, the University of Guelph. She was in our Toronto studio.

This segment was produced by The Current’s Mary Lynk and Josh Bloch.

http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/gamechanger/2012/03/16/vandana-shiva-feature-interview/

Posted in Fresh Offerings | Leave a comment

How Earthworms destroy Forests

Base invaders: How worms destroy forests This external link will open in a new window: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health/Base+invaders/6280837/story.html

click above for full story

 

Earthworms are chewing through the leaf litter that normally lines the ground of North American forests. And when it disappears, TOM SPEARS writes, so do plants, and bugs and birds. [Ottawa Citizen, March 10, 2012]

 

Posted in Fresh Offerings | Leave a comment